Re: WimMark I for 2.5.64-mm1

Andrew Morton (
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:43:33 -0800

Joel Becker <> wrote:
> WimMark I report for 2.5.64-mm1
> Runs with anticipatory scheduler: 547.28 580.69
> Runs with deadline scheduler: 1557.79 1360.52


I have a patch in my inbox which increases NickMark I throughput by 400%, so
it should help this one.

Is the difference between 2.5.64 and 2.5.64-mm1 statistically significant?
(It should be - the readahead changes).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at