Re: [PATCH][ATM] obselete some atm_vcc members

David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Sun, 09 Mar 2003 13:34:53 -0800 (PST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] Work around console initialization ordering problem"
Previous message: Jeremy Fitzhardinge: "Re: Kernel bug in dcache.h:266; 2.5.64, EIP at sysfs_remove_dir"
In reply to: chas williams: "Re: [PATCH][ATM] obselete some atm_vcc members"

From: chas williams <chas@locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2003 07:35:41 -0500

In message <20030308.125024.44441125.davem@redhat.com>,"David S. Miller" writes:
>This stuff was all against a tree which still had the atm_dev
>semaphore instead of the new spinlock. Therefore half of the patches
>rejected and I had to put these parts in by hand.

err... its the other way around?

right

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] Work around console initialization ordering problem"
Previous message: Jeremy Fitzhardinge: "Re: Kernel bug in dcache.h:266; 2.5.64, EIP at sysfs_remove_dir"
In reply to: chas williams: "Re: [PATCH][ATM] obselete some atm_vcc members"