> verbose mode. If you skip the oldconfig step, the config tool is called
> anyway and checks the configuration and only asks as necessary. The same
> mode could be used for oldconfig, but I didn't want to change the
> behaviour needlessly.
The reason to respond is that all the output from conf looks useless.
What is the usage of conf being so verbose?
If it is required then keep it. But making conf that verbose only
because configure was that verbose . There is no point in that.
Not a needlessly change, but more in the area - it was about time..
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/