named vs 2.5.64-mm5

jjs (jjs@tmsusa.com)
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:29:12 -0800


Greetings -

2.5.64-mm4 and -mm5 seem more rugged than previous
kernels, but there are a couple of minor nits - one of them
is the tendency of named (which appears to work reliably
under 2.4) to go catatonic under recent 2.5.6x kernels -

More verbose kernel logging may shed some light - or is
this just a red herring? I get a tons of these in 2.5.64-mm5:

<...>
process `named' is using obsolete setsockopt SO_BSDCOMPAT
process `named' is using obsolete setsockopt SO_BSDCOMPAT
process `named' is using obsolete setsockopt SO_BSDCOMPAT
<...>

Anybody here running a compliant version of named?

(This is the bind 9.2.1 which ships with Red Hat 8.0)

Best Regards,

Joe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/