Oh, and while I was sending this, I thought I'd ask a question.
Regarding the folks who still say "not good enough", might it be
possible to export bk metadata into, say, a compressed file in each
subdir in the repository? Such a file would contain any relevant bk
metadata for files in that subdir.
I don't know if that's something one would want to do for performance
reasons or otherwise, but it sound like the thing that would finally
quiet those who are complaining.
Good work! I hope BitchKeeper turns out just as nice.
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 09:52, Larry McVoy wrote:
> I think those repositories are stable enough you can start to count on
> them. Sam and others have looked over their changes and think that
> the CVS tree has accurate data.
>
> The CVS repository is at
>
> cvs -d:pserver:anonymous@kernel.bkbits.net:/home/cvs
>
> and it has two top level directories, linux-2.4 and linux-2.5.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/