Re: [s390x] Patch for execve with a mode switch

[BOEBLINGEN LINUX390]

Hi Pete,
>I still think you are making a mistake defininig your own
>arch_get_unmapped_area(), because: 1. sparc64 does it correctly
>with the common code, so it can be done; 2. architecture
>specific duplicates of common code may bitrot. But have it
>your way, I won't resubmit, for the sake of staying aligned
>with upstream.

I am not too happy with the arch_get_unmapped_area myself. I not
happpy with the TIF_ABI_PENDING bit either, there has to be a
way to do this in a simply and straighforward way.
I'll keep thinking about it.

blue skies,
  Martin.