Re: 2.5.64-mm8 breaks MASQ

[Tom Sightler]

On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 05:55, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Shawn <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > This actually broke in -mm7, but I don't know what causes it.
> > 
> > I have to admit, I haven't even looked at the patch to see what changed.
> > Oh well, I suspect good ol' 65-mm1 will fix things up. If so, my TiVo
> > could stop holding it's breath. ;)
> > 
> > Anyone else seeing this?
> 
> Stephen is looking into it.  Please send him your iptables
> configuration info. 

My iptables config is just a simple one-liner as follows:

iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j MASQUERADE

eth1 is an Aironet PCCARD wireless adapter connected to my corporate
network

eth0 is 3c556 (3c59x driver) Mini-PCI 10/100 with various systems
connected to it.

I also regularly NAT my VMware virtual machine (normally configured for
host only networking) which sits on vmnet1.

I've tried several variations of the iptables option, such as:

iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.4.1/24 -j MASQUERADE

iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ! eth0 -j MASQUERADE

All of these variations work without the brlock patches backed out. 
Actually, I haven't been able to get any MASQ/NAT options to work with
the brlock removal patches.

Let me know if you need more info.

Later,
Tom