Re: [PATCH] fix nanosleep() granularity bumps

Andrew Morton (akpm@digeo.com)
Wed, 19 Mar 2003 01:42:30 -0800


george anzinger <george@mvista.com> wrote:
>
> The attached patch is for 2.5.65. As of this moment, the bk patch has
> not been posted to the snapshots directory. I will wait for that to
> update.

Don't use the snapshots directory. Use

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.5/testing/cset/

It is more up to date.

> For what its worth, can someone explain how the add_timer call from
> run_timers was causing a problem. The code looks right to me, unless
> the caller is so nasty as to continue to do the same thing (which
> would loop forever).

That was the problem.

> In this case, the simple fix is to bump the
> base->timer_jiffies at the beginning of the loop rather than the end.
> This would cause the new timer to be put in the next jiffie instead
> of the current one AND it is free!

Didn't think of that - I just ported up Andrea's fix.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/