Re: HPT372N not supported?

O.Sezer (sezero@superonline.com)
Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:07:02 +0200


pci_ids.h also has to be patched; something like this one:

--- linux/include/linux/pci_ids.h.orig 2003-03-11 18:50:01
+++ linux/include/linux/pci_ids.h 2003-03-19 16:16:09
@@ -975,6 +975,7 @@
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_TTI_HPT372 0x0005
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_TTI_HPT302 0x0006
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_TTI_HPT371 0x0007
+#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_TTI_HPT372N 0x0009
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_TTI_HPT374 0x0008

#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA 0x1106

--
O.Sezer

"Alan Cox" wrote:

On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 17:28, Henning Schroeder wrote: > I don=C5=BDt like that solution very much, though, because the highpoint > driver uses the scsi subsystem. Looking through highpoints hpt.c file > I could not find very much differences in the way the HPT372N is > accessed from the HPT372-way. Maybe somebody (Andre Hedrick?) could > look through the code and integrate the HPT372N into > linux/drivers/ide/pci/hpt366.c? This feat is regrettably way beyound > my own programming capability.

Try the patch attached below. The 372N doesn't seem to be that different except that we have to use different pci timing thresholds. The patch below isn't tested as I don't have a 372N.

> I would love to hear about the current status of that chip. I do not > need the RAID capability, just the extra IDE ports.

hptraid should already support the raid bits

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/