Re: [patch][rfc] Memory Binding (1/1)

[Andrew Morton]

Matthew Dobson <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Okee dokee...  Here's the real core of the patch.

Looks saneish to me.  I'd like to see thorough benchmark results when it is
complete.  And it would be nice to make address_space.binding go away if
!CONFIG_NUMA.

The explicit knowledge of ZONE_DMA/ZONE_NORMAL/ZONE_HIGHMEM in get_zonetype()
should not be necessary - you don't want it to explode if ZONE_DMA32 is
added.  It should be indexing into node_zonelists in some manner.

Will this code work if all memory is in ZONE_DMA, as some architectures do?