Re: fairsched + O(1) process scheduler

Robert Love (rml@tech9.net)
02 Apr 2003 16:35:00 -0500


On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 16:36, Antonio Vargas wrote:

> I've been thinking about this thing a while ago, and I think I could do this:
>
> a. Have a kernel thread which wakes up on each tick.

Why not use the timer tick itself? It already calls scheduler_tick()...

Oh, because you need to grab uidhash_lock? Ew. Needing a kernel thread
for this is not pretty.

> Also, this locking rule means I can't even read current->user->time_slice?
> What if I changed the type to an atomic_int?

You can always read a single word-sized type atomically. No need for
atomic_t's.

Robert Love

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/