Re: acpi spinlock breakage

Dave Jones (davej@codemonkey.org.uk)
Thu, 3 Apr 2003 18:45:26 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] smp_call_function needs mb() - oopsable"
Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: Bugs sitting in the NEW state for more than 2 weeks"
In reply to: Shawn Starr: "Re: acpi spinlock breakage"

On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 12:26:12PM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
> Confirmed :-(
>
> Trying to find out what broke, but none of those members are listed even
> inside osl.c (perhaps a header down the line).

They're members of the spinlock_t struct.
That acpi_handle needs to be a spinlock_t *

Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] smp_call_function needs mb() - oopsable"
Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: Bugs sitting in the NEW state for more than 2 weeks"
In reply to: Shawn Starr: "Re: acpi spinlock breakage"