Re: WimMark I report for 2.5.66-mm3

Nick Piggin (piggin@cyberone.com.au)
Sat, 05 Apr 2003 05:53:54 +1000


Hugh Dickins wrote:

>On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Joel Becker wrote:
>
>
>>WimMark I report for 2.5.66-mm3
>>
>>Runs (deadline): 1736.51 1681.50 1010.98
>>Runs (antic): 579.62 496.75 517.06
>>
>> WimMark I is a rough benchmark we have been running
>>here at Oracle against various kernels. Each run tests an OLTP
>>workload on the Oracle database with somewhat restrictive memory
>>conditions. etc. etc. etc.
>>
>
>No doubt the people who need to know do already know, but each time
>you post this I wish that the long exegesis accompanying the numbers
>would say whether a big number is better or worse than a small number.
>
A bigger number is better. AS does have something missing
in recent mms due to a bad interaction with SCSI, but it
is still around 20% below deadline for this test. It is
being worked on.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/