Dave> On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 06:44:54AM +0200, Jurriaan wrote:
 >> From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
 >> Date: Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 10:10:53PM -0400
 >> > Just booted into 2.5.67-BK-latest (plus my __builtin_memcpy patch). 
 >> > Everything seems to be running just fine, so naturally one must nitpick 
 >> > little things like being told my CPU is running at 0.000 Mhz.  :)
 >> > 
 >> fwiw, my Athlon XP2400 does the same in 2.5.67-ac1:
 >> 
 >> processor	: 0
 >> vendor_id	: AuthenticAMD
 >> cpu family	: 6
 >> model		: 8
 >> model name	: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+
 >> stepping	: 1
 >> cpu MHz		: 0.000
 >> cache size	: 256 KB
 >> bogomips	: 1970.17
 Dave> Curious. Do either of you have any cpufreq bits enabled?
 Dave> If so, does it go away if you disable them?
 Dave> That frobs with cpu_khz, so it *could* be not initialising
 Dave> it someplace.  Especially if your hardware turns out to be
 Dave> unsupported by any of the cpufreq backend drivers..
It does not help me with 2.5.67-ac2 + pcmcia patch. I get 0.000 MHz,
589.82 BogoMIPS with or without CPUFreq. It did the same thing with
2.5.67-ac1 (did not test w/o CPUFreq).
The box is 600 MHz PIII (Coppermine) in Dell Inspiron 5000. On the plus
side I kind of like the # of insns per clock cycle ;-)
As Jeff said it's almost OK otherwise; it hangs on boot without the
pcmcia patch and I saw USB Storage oopses.
                                                Petr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/