Re: [PATCH] new system call mknod64

H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
21 Apr 2003 16:02:47 -0700

Followup to: <UTC200304212143.h3LLh6e02148.aeb@smtp.cwi.nl>
By author: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> and in fact the patches I have been giving out use kdev_t
> as internal format, where you can think of kdev_t as
> u64, or, if you prefer, as struct { u32 major, minor; }.
>

Any reason why we don't just *make it* a struct? (Well, besides that
it'd somewhat suck on 64-bit architectures?)

-hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/