Re: TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE & stack location

[H. Peter Anvin]

Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> 
> Right ... I was just suggesting changing it by default. Was wondering if
> anyone knew of anything it'd break. Your issue with NULL pointers is
> interesting, but I'm not sure this would really affect that much ... the
> stack is normally tiny in comparison.
> 

Normally, yes, but there are applications which use very large stacks.

	-hpa