Re: will be able to load new kernel without restarting?

Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Mon, 05 May 2003 14:56:14 -0400


--==_Exmh_-1868142314P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Mon, 05 May 2003 14:49:15 EDT, Timothy Miller said:

> The only major issue is that the data structures used to manage
> processes would be different from one scheduler to the next. One
> possible answer would be to have an unloading driver translate all of
> its process information into the default scheduler's format. A newly
> loaded one would translate it to its own format. Things that would be
> lost in the translation include interactivity information, etc.

We just had a similar battle regarding LSM extended attributes on files,
the biggest problem being what a module should do if it doesn't understand
the formats and semantics of the previous module...

It's certainly *doable* - the telcos have been doing this since whichever
of the SSn systems was first programmable rather than hardwire logic. The
big question is whether it will still look like Linux if you implement it.

--==_Exmh_-1868142314P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQE+trPOcC3lWbTT17ARAlSGAJ9Da+YXyc0/6nGXwFV9TU53p4zEUQCg0Egb
zWE/lR35Br9mdu2xVJ0Ykus=
=ByWL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_-1868142314P--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/