Re: 2.5.69 just doesn't boot (neither does anything > .67)

Daniel Pittman (daniel@rimspace.net)
Tue, 06 May 2003 23:26:02 +1000


On Tue, 6 May 2003, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Brett wrote:

[...]

>> and anyway, can you provide any backup that this will fix it ?? what
>> changed between 2.5.66 and 2.5.67 to stop grub loading the kernel ?
>> why hasn't anyone else reported this ???
>
> I couldn't boot 2.5 at all until I upgraded an ancient grub. Having
> a recent bootloader is never a bad thing though, and 0.92 is pretty
> old.

0.92 is successfully booting 2.5.6[89] here, and 0.93 (Debian or
upstream) fails to boot on most of my machines here.

YMMV, of course, but 0.92 works for me.

Daniel

-- 
Don't join the book burners. Don't think you are going to conceal faults by
concealing evidence they ever existed.
        -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/