Re: oops 2.5.68 ohci1394/ IRQ/acpi

[Jeff Garzik]

Grover, Andrew wrote:
> Ohhh so we need to not just return nonzero, but return 1 (aka
> IRQ_HANDLED?) Well, then this makes sense. Sorry about that.
> 
> btw I think the line in handle_IRQ_event that reads
> 
> if (retval != 1) {
> 
> should be
> 
> if (retval != IRQ_HANDLED) {

Then I must further nit-pick:  if IRQ_HANDLED is considered "non-zero" 
the above test should be against IRQ_NONE, to avoid directly considering 
any single value _the_ non-zero value...

	Jeff