Re: The disappearing sys_call_table export.

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 02:54:35PM +0200, Terje Eggestad wrote:
> So what you're saying here is not that you object to having people doing
> syscall hooks, just that operating on the syscall_table symbol directly
> is error prone (to which I wholeheartedly agree). 
> 
> Then you reject a "proper mechanism".....

Maybe you have a different notion of proper mechanism then everyone
else.  BTW, you could easily have fixed your driver in the time you
spent trolling on lkml..