Re: The disappearing sys_call_table export.

Shachar Shemesh (lkml@shemesh.biz)
Thu, 08 May 2003 22:10:21 +0300


Christoph Hellwig wrote:

>Maybe you have a different notion of proper mechanism then everyone
>else.
>
Out of personal interest - would a mechanism that promised the following
be considered a "proper mechanism"?
1. Work on all platforms.
2. Allow load and unload in arbitrary order and timings (which also
means "be race free").
3. Have low/zero overhead if not used

Would you also require:
4. Have reasonable overhead when used
a "must have" demand? Would, on the other hand, a:
4b. Have zero overhead when used for functions not hooked
be an alternative demand?

I'm currently trying to work with some other subscribers of this list on
a design. Getting 1, 2 and 3 is a complicated enough task, of course. I
would like to hear estimates about inclusion chances should we manage to
come up with an implmentation that lives up to all the above.

Thanks,
Shachar

-- 
Shachar Shemesh
Open Source integration consultant
Home page & resume - http://www.shemesh.biz/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/