Re: ALSA busted in 2.5.69

[walt]

Torrey Hoffman wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-05-09 at 01:09, Giuliano Pochini wrote:
> 
>>On 08-May-2003 Torrey Hoffman wrote:
>>
>>>ALSA isn't working for me in 2.5.69.  It appears to be because
>>>/proc/asound/dev is missing the control devices.
> 
> ...
> 
>>If you are not using devfs, you need to create the devices. There is a
>>script in the ALSA-driver package to do that. Otherwise I can't help
>>you because I never tried devfs and linux 2.5.x.
> 
> 
> No.  /dev/snd is a symbolic link to /proc/asound/dev,
> and that symbolic link was created by the script you mention.
> (I am not using devfs.)
> 
> So the missing "/dev/snd/controlC0" should actually be created
> by the ALSA modules in the proc filesystem as
> "/proc/asound/dev/controlC0".  But only the timer device is there.

Warning:  I'm no expert on any of this -- but -- I'm listening to sound
right now using 2.5.69 (with devfs) and this is what I see:

There are NO symlinks from /dev to /proc.  None.

/dev/snd and /dev/sound are real directories -- neither is a symlink.

#ls -l /dev/snd
total 0
crw-------    1 wa1ter   audio    116,   0 Dec 31  1969 controlC0
crw-------    1 wa1ter   audio    116,  32 Dec 31  1969 controlC1
crw-------    1 wa1ter   audio    116,  64 Dec 31  1969 controlC2
crw-------    1 wa1ter   audio    116,  96 Dec 31  1969 controlC3
crw-------    1 wa1ter   audio    116, 128 Dec 31  1969 controlC4
crw-------    1 wa1ter   audio    116, 160 Dec 31  1969 controlC5
crw-------    1 wa1ter   audio    116, 192 Dec 31  1969 controlC6
crw-------    1 wa1ter   audio    116, 224 Dec 31  1969 controlC7
crw-------    1 wa1ter   audio    116,  24 Dec 31  1969 pcmC0D0c
crw-------    1 wa1ter   audio    116,  16 Dec 31  1969 pcmC0D0p
crw-------    1 wa1ter   audio    116,  25 Dec 31  1969 pcmC0D1c
crw-------    1 wa1ter   audio    116,  17 Dec 31  1969 pcmC0D1p
crw-------    1 wa1ter   audio    116,   1 Dec 31  1969 seq
crw-------    1 wa1ter   audio    116,  33 Dec 31  1969 timer

#ls -l /dev/sound
total 0
crw-------    1 wa1ter   audio     14,  12 Dec 31  1969 adsp
crw-------    1 wa1ter   audio     14,   4 Dec 31  1969 audio
crw-------    1 wa1ter   audio     14,   3 Dec 31  1969 dsp
crw-------    1 wa1ter   audio     14,   0 Dec 31  1969 mixer
crw-------    1 wa1ter   audio     14,   1 Dec 31  1969 sequencer
crw-------    1 wa1ter   audio     14,   8 Dec 31  1969 sequencer2

#ls -l /dev/dsp
lr-xr-xr-x    1 root     root            9 May  9 10:33 /dev/dsp -> sound/dsp
#ls -l /dev/adsp
lr-xr-xr-x    1 root     root           10 May  9 10:33 /dev/adsp -> sound/adsp

Seems to me that any symlinks to /proc don't really belong in /dev.
Any opinions to the contrary?  (Remember:  my sound is working just fine.)