Re: [ATM] [UPDATE] unbalanced exit path in Forerunner HE

David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Sat, 10 May 2003 07:02:34 -0700 (PDT)


From: chas williams <chas@locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 09:52:49 -0400

In message <20030510062015.A21408@infradead.org>,Christoph Hellwig writes:
>kfree(NULL) if perfectly fine. Also please untangle all this if
>statements to two separate lines.

but its ok for usb drivers?

Bad ugly code in one area of the kernel is not an excuse
for it in other areas :-)

Really, putting a statement on the same line as the if
test controlling it's execution is very unreadable. Most
people's eyes expect to see:

if (test)
IF_CODE_BLOCK

Whether it be one or more lines. I cannot count how many locking bugs
escaped for a long time because of utter shit like this:

if (test) return 0;

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/