Re: 2.6 must-fix list, v2

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:17:54PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> But I do not view non-ia32 support as being a 2.6.0 requirement.  I'd be OK
>> with 2.6.0 working _only_ on ia32.  Other architectures will catch up when
>> they can.  The only core requirement is that 2.6.0 not contain gross
>> x86isms which make other ports impossible.

On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 11:25:32PM +0100, Dave Jones wrote:
> I kinda sorta agree. Holding up 2.6.0 for other ports to catch up
> could end up with us waiting, and in the meantime, Linus merging other
> stuff which could break non-x86 etc..
> Once we're into 2.6.x though, would it be unfeasable to hold off on
> final point releases until arch maintainers have sent in a 'make things
> work for this release' diff ? Ie, make rc's "strict bugfixes only, and
> arch updates"
> Though, for some archs (sparc32 springs to mind), we may end up waiting
> quite a while, so perhaps just settle on a handful of 'to be kept
> up-to-date' archs ?

MIPS seems to be taking a while too.

-- wli