Re: 2.5.69-mm5: reverting i8259-shutdown.patch

Zwane Mwaikambo (zwane@linuxpower.ca)
Thu, 15 May 2003 02:13:45 -0400 (EDT)


On Wed, 14 May 2003, Andrew Morton wrote:

> I'd say that as long as the shutdown routines are executed in reverse
> order of startup, then the core driver stuff has fulfilled its
> obligations.
>
> In this case we need to understand why the lockup is happening - what
> code is requiring 8259 services after the thing has been turned off?
> Could be that the bug lies there.

The registration is somewhat unfair here, it depends on device_initcall
and we initialise the 8259 in init_IRQ.

Zwane

-- 
function.linuxpower.ca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/