Re: [PATCH 4/3] Replace dynamic percpu implementation

Rusty Russell (rusty@au1.ibm.com)
Thu, 22 May 2003 10:35:51 +1000

In message <20030521103156.GB2861@in.ibm.com> you write:
> Considering these results, this allocator seems to be a step in the right
> direction.

I had a great chat with David M-T: I'm backing off this until we have
a IA64 code which keeps its current advantages.

If you can find someone to work on the IA64 specific stuff, I think
everyone will be happy.

Cheers!
Rusty.

--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

tes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/