Re: Linux 2.5.70 compile error

Dave Jones (davej@codemonkey.org.uk)
Tue, 27 May 2003 19:40:16 +0100


On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 08:19:39PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:

> > What the hell am I supposed to enter here? This is just friggin ugly
> > and un-readable. It should be cleaned up.
> I agree and I already fixed this here, so with the next update this will
> look like this:
>
> Subarchitecture Type
> > 1. PC-compatible (X86_PC)
> 2. Voyager (NCR) (X86_VOYAGER)
> 3. NUMAQ (IBM/Sequent) (X86_NUMAQ)
> 4. Summit/EXA (IBM x440) (X86_SUMMIT)
> 5. Support for other sub-arch SMP systems with more than 8 CPUs (X86_BIGSMP)
> 6. SGI 320/540 (Visual Workstation) (X86_VISWS)
> 7. Generic architecture (Summit, bigsmp, default) (X86_GENERICARCH) (NEW)
> choice[1-7]:
>
> This has other advantages too, one can see now which options were newly
> added and the individual help texts are accessible.

Given that 99% of users will be choosing option 1, it might be a
good thing to have the remaining options only shown if a
CONFIG_X86_SUBARCHS=y and have things default to option 1 if =n.

Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/