Re: 2.5.70-mm1

Andrew Morton (akpm@digeo.com)
Thu, 29 May 2003 14:14:05 -0700


"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com> wrote:
>
> > OK, a 10x improvement isn't too bad. I'm hoping the gap between ext2 and
> > ext3 is mainly idle time and not spinning-on-locks time.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> 2024927 267.3% total
> >> 1677960 472.8% default_idle
> >> 116350 0.0% .text.lock.transaction
> >> 42783 0.0% do_get_write_access
> >> 40293 0.0% journal_dirty_metadata
> >> 34251 6414.0% __down
> >> 27867 9166.8% .text.lock.attr
> >
> > Bah. In inode_setattr(), move the mark_inode_dirty() outside
> > lock_kernel().
>
> OK, will do.

Actually we can just ditch it.

diff -puN fs/attr.c~inode_setattr-speedup fs/attr.c
--- 25/fs/attr.c~inode_setattr-speedup Thu May 29 14:01:54 2003
+++ 25-akpm/fs/attr.c Thu May 29 14:07:57 2003
@@ -81,7 +81,6 @@ int inode_setattr(struct inode * inode,
}
}

- lock_kernel();
if (ia_valid & ATTR_UID)
inode->i_uid = attr->ia_uid;
if (ia_valid & ATTR_GID)
@@ -93,12 +92,13 @@ int inode_setattr(struct inode * inode,
if (ia_valid & ATTR_CTIME)
inode->i_ctime = attr->ia_ctime;
if (ia_valid & ATTR_MODE) {
- inode->i_mode = attr->ia_mode;
+ umode_t mode = attr->ia_mode;
+
if (!in_group_p(inode->i_gid) && !capable(CAP_FSETID))
- inode->i_mode &= ~S_ISGID;
+ mode &= ~S_ISGID;
+ inode->i_mode = mode;
}
mark_inode_dirty(inode);
- unlock_kernel();
out:
return error;
}

> >> 20016 2619.9% __wake_up
> >> 19632 927.4% schedule
> >> 12204 0.0% .text.lock.sched
> >> 12128 0.0% start_this_handle
> >> 10011 0.0% journal_add_journal_head
> >
> > hm, lots of context switches still.
>
> I think that's ext3 busily kicking the living crap out of semaphores ;-)

But I deleted them all!. Well. There is one semaphore left in ext3/jbd,
and that is for serialisation around the oh-shit-we're-out-of-space
checkpointing code. I shall go on a hat diet if that is being a problem.

hmm, very odd.

You could try my "find out who's doing down() too much" patch:

diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/semaphore.c~down-diag arch/i386/kernel/semaphore.c
--- 25/arch/i386/kernel/semaphore.c~down-diag Thu May 29 14:11:46 2003
+++ 25-akpm/arch/i386/kernel/semaphore.c Thu May 29 14:12:18 2003
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ void __down(struct semaphore * sem)
sem->sleepers++;
for (;;) {
int sleepers = sem->sleepers;
+ static int count;

/*
* Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't
@@ -79,6 +80,10 @@ void __down(struct semaphore * sem)
sem->sleepers = 1; /* us - see -1 above */
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);

+ if (count++ > 100000) {
+ count = 0;
+ dump_stack();
+ }
schedule();

spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);

_

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/