Re: [Patch] 2.5.70-bk11 zlib cleanup #3 Z_NULL

Jörn Engel (joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de)
Fri, 6 Jun 2003 21:13:46 +0200


On Fri, 6 June 2003 11:54:45 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Jörn Engel wrote:
> >
> > How do you feel about "if (z->state->blocks != NULL)"? Remove the
> > pointless !=NULL or keep it?
>
> I don't mind it, but it doesn't buy much.
>
> It's actually in some other cases where I think there is a readability
> issue, ie in more complex conditionals I personally prefer the simpler
> cersion, ie I much prefer something like
>
> if (ptr && ptr->ops && ptr->ops->shutdown)
> ptr->ops->shutdown(ptr, xxxx);
>
> over the pointless NULL-masturbation in something like
>
> if (ptr != NULL && ptr->ops != NULL && ptr->ops->shutdown != NULL)
> ptr->ops->shutdown(ptr, xxxx)
>
> which I just is much less readable than the simple version.

Good example. The ones I found in the zlib are not that bad and I am
lazy, so I'll leave them for someone else.

Jörn

-- 
Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgement that
something else is more important than fear.
-- Ambrose Redmoon
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/