David, I think MTD needs an audit to ensure that no further cases exist.
static void cfi_intelext_sync (struct mtd_info *mtd)
{
for (i=0; !ret && i<cfi->numchips; i++) {
chip = &cfi->chips[i];
spin_lock(chip->mutex);
ret = get_chip(map, chip, chip->start, FL_SYNCING);
...
}
/* Unlock the chips again */
for (i--; i >=0; i--) {
chip = &cfi->chips[i];
spin_lock(chip->mutex);
...
spin_unlock(chip->mutex);
}
}
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/