Re: bad: scheduling while atomic!

David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Sun, 15 Jun 2003 18:14:38 +0100

On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 14:29, Russell King wrote:
> It would be useful if we could balance the spin_locks with the
> spin_unlocks. 8)

I can see how that could be considered appropriate. There are a handful
of other such trivia in CVS which want to go to Linus shortly -- I
assume that includes your afs partitioning fix?

-- 
dwmw2




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/