Re: patch for common networking error messages

Janice M Girouard (janiceg@us.ibm.com)
Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:59:11 -0500


I agree that it's not desirable to introduce a bunch of messages that we
aren't already logging. I didn't show the netif_msg prefix because I
was trying to focus the patch on the common messages, but you would
normally proceed a message with:

if netif_msg_link()
printk("some text to indicate the link is up/down")

The netif_msg_link test would normally filter out what messages should
be logged.

Or, just leave out the message call. I added one or two messages to the
tg3 and e1000 drivers to demonstrate where you might use these common
messages... just to show that various drivers could use the text.
Actually using the specific message would be completely up to the
developer.

Jaince

David S. Miller wrote:

> From: Janice M Girouard <janiceg@us.ibm.com>
> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:30:22 -0500
>
> EMSG_NET_LINK_UP "%s: state change: link up, %d Mbps, %s-duplex\n"
>
>Should indicate flow control state too.
>
> EMSG_NET_START_QUEUE "%s: performance event: (re)starting netdev queue\n"
> EMSG_NET_STOP_QUEUE "%s: performance event: stopping netdev queue\n"
>
>Oh _ABSOLUTELY NOT_, you're not printing a message
>for normal events like this. Especially those that are
>going to occur on highly loaded systems.
>
>
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/