Re: [PATCH] Support non reserved ports for NFS client

Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de)
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 22:57:19 +0200


On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 01:07:05PM -0700, Bruce Allan wrote:
> May I make the suggestion that instead of creating a new flag (i.e.
> NFS_MOUNT_NONRESERVED) and using a new bit in the flags field of struct
> nfs_mount_data, Andi use the already existing and unused NFS_MOUNT_SECURE
> assuming that is what was originally intended for this bit. This would
> also match in name with the secure/insecure export option on the server.

Makes sense yes. Thanks for the suggestion.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/