Re: [PATCH] VFS autmounter support v2

On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:46:50AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
 
> Besides, going back to your original argument, I think you make an invalid
> assertion:
> 
> 	Namespaces are completely unrelated - I have them set for two
> 	different users that happen to need some common files, but otherwise
> 	have very different environments.
> 
> They are not quite completely unrelated. The only way (or so it seems) to get
> a new namespace is to derive one by way of CLONE_NS. This clones the namespace
> of the parent, and so the child's namespace then should have all the features
> of the parent's namespace _UNTIL_ at such time the child or one of its
> descendents rearranges the topology!

And how the fuck do you "rearrange topology" with your patch?!?