Re: Sco vs. IBM

Miquel van Smoorenburg (miquels@cistron-office.nl)
Fri, 20 Jun 2003 09:17:47 +0000 (UTC)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] Initial Vector Fix for loop.c."
Previous message: James Morris: "Re: [PATCH 2.4.21][FIX] use mod_timer"
Maybe in reply to: Martin List-Petersen: "Sco vs. IBM"

In article <A46BBDB345A7D5118EC90002A5072C780E0409E9@orsmsx116.jf.intel.com>,
Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky <inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com> wrote:
>> From: miquels@cistron-office.nl [mailto:miquels@cistron-office.nl]
>> There is. If you want to develop a commercial application under
>> KDE you need to pay TrollTech for the Qt license. Basically
>> TrollTech controls all commercial KDE applications.
>
>I'd say that GPL file appended to the dual license
>of Qt says otherwise ... but IANAL...

I have nothing against Qt or Trolltech. I just happen to think that
the GPL is a bad license for a core-library (which Qt is for KDE).
But I shouldn't have gone this far offtopic anyway. Sorry.

Mike.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] Initial Vector Fix for loop.c."
Previous message: James Morris: "Re: [PATCH 2.4.21][FIX] use mod_timer"
Maybe in reply to: Martin List-Petersen: "Sco vs. IBM"