Re: [PATCH] sleep_decay for interactivity 2.5.72 - testers

[Mike Galbraith]

At 12:29 PM 6/20/2003 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
>On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 07:32, Andreas Boman wrote:
> >
> > Basicly, for normal usage this kernel is acting *very* well here.
>
>Great! Thanks for doing this testing. I've attached a patch with the updated
>figures and cc'ed lkml for others to test.

Thud is still much more effective at starvation than stock (zero decay 
during run phase), and a parallel kernel build still goes to 
max-interactive virtually instantly.

         -Mike