Re: [PATCH] Isapnp warning

Sean Neakums (sneakums@zork.net)
Sat, 21 Jun 2003 16:04:35 +0100


Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> writes:

> On 21 Jun 2003, Alan Cox wrote:
>> On Sul, 2003-06-15 at 19:36, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > Isapnp: Kill warning if CONFIG_PCI is not set
>> >
>> > --- linux-2.5.x/drivers/pnp/resource.c Tue May 27 19:03:04 2003
>> > +++ linux-m68k-2.5.x/drivers/pnp/resource.c Sun Jun 8 13:31:20 2003
>> > @@ -97,7 +97,9 @@
>> >
>> > int pnp_add_irq_resource(struct pnp_dev *dev, int depnum, struct pnp_irq *data)
>> > {
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
>> > int i;
>> > +#endif
>>
>> This is far uglier than te warning
>
> It depends on your goals. These warnings distract us from the real harmful
> warnings. Will we ever have a kernel that compiles with -Werror?

Unless GCC never emits an invalid warning, no.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/