Re: [PATCH] Isapnp warning

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 04:53:32PM -0700, Linus Torvalds escreveu:
> 
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2003, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > Meanwhile, let's do this:
> 
> I'd prefer the C99 thing, ie
> 
> 	for (int i = xxx ...)
> 
> syntax. I know gcc-3.x supports it, maybe 2.96 does too? If so, we could
> just add "-std=c99" or whatever, and start using that.

Humm, I'd love to do that, i.e. to make gcc 3 required, lots of good stuff
like this one, anonymous structs, etc, etc, lots of stuff could be done in
an easier way, but are we ready to abandon gcc 2.95.*? Can anyone confirm
if gcc 2.96 accepts this?

- Arnaldo