Re: Crusoe's performance on linux?

Vojtech Pavlik (vojtech@suse.cz)
Mon, 23 Jun 2003 10:26:23 +0200


On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 10:58:12AM +0700, Samphan Raruenrom wrote:

> Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> > Could you a test just for me? Take vanilla 2.4.21 and then
> > make oldconfig; make dep; time make bzImage
> > That's basically what I want to know how long will take, since
> > it's one of the most common time consuming tasks the thing will
> > have to handle.
> Done! Here're the results:-
>
> Desktop - Pentium III 1 G Hz 754 MB -> 10.x min.
> Tablet PC - Crusoe TM5800 1 GHz 731 MB -> 17.x min.
>
> From freshdiagnos benchmack, the TPC has about 2x faster RAM.
> I use tmpfs for the whole process so disk speed didn't count.
> Both test run without X or any foreground process using
> 2.4.21-ac1 and RedHat kernel.

Desktop - 1.1 GHz Athlon Tbird 512M RAM, using disk -> 3.7 min

This is with gcc 2.95.2, which may give it an unfair advantage, though.
Or is something else wrong here?

-- 
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs, SuSE CR
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/