> On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 15:03, Ed L Cashin wrote:
>> Ed L Cashin <ecashin@uga.edu> writes:
>>
>> ...
>> > I haven't tried the experiment you suggested where I disable e100 in
>> > the kernel configuration.
>>
>> OK, I just tried taking out the intel e100 driver and building in
>> Becker's eepro100 driver. This kernel can do kexec fine.
>
> I just had lunch with someone that knows a lot more about the e100
> driver than I do.
>
> I would be curious to know what happens if you disable CONFIG_PM (as
> seen in your .config), disable the eepro100 driver, re-enable the e100
> driver, and then try kexec again.
Yes, kexec works on the same system when I disable CONFIG_PM and use
the e100 driver. Sorry it took a while for me to get around to
testing it.
I should mention that the kernel is a little different than the other
one I was using. It's 2.5.73-osdl3 with this .config file:
http://www.cs.uga.edu/~cashin/temp/config-2.5.73-osdl3-20030708-120629
-- --Ed L Cashin | PGP public key: ecashin@uga.edu | http://noserose.net/e/pgp/- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/