Re: [patch] SCHED_SOFTRR starve-free linux scheduling policy ...

Davide Libenzi (
Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:22:59 -0700 (PDT)

On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Mike Galbraith wrote:

> Yes, and it worked fine. No cpu load I tossed at it caused a skip.

I tried yesterday a thud.c load and it did not get a single skip here
either. It is interesting what thud.c can do to latency (let's not talk
about irman because things get really nasty). With a simple `thud 5` the
latency rised to more then one full second, as you can see by the graphs
inside the SOFTRR page. No buffer size can cope with that.

- Davide

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at