> On Sun, 30 Nov 1997, Jon Lewis wrote:
>
> > I'm somewhat interested in this as well. If it doesn't seriously impact
> > performance or noticably impact stability, and is SMP safe. I have a big
> > server where memory seems to be slowly disappearing under at least some
> > of the late 2.0.31-pre kernels and 2.0.32.
> >
>
> I wouldn't mind joining the test as well. I've several 4,000+ active
> account systems that seem to be suffering from the "vanishing memory act".
> I like to give general purpose systems LOTS of memory so it hasn't
> impacted operations as yet. :-)
I, too would like to help. I don't run any sort of mission critical apps
(its a non-networked (so far) home system), but I WOULD like to help in
any way I can.
NOTE: This very minute is bad timing. Schoolwork is very heavy at this
time of year. Late December would be very good timing.
>
> Operationally, I'm more concerned about the newsservers I just upgraded
> from 29 to 32. They don't have ANY memory to spare, esp. the reader
> machines (running INN as opposed to Diablo).
>
> -Jonathan < >
> --------------------------------------------------------***MM>>>>>>>>-(o)(o)---
> Jonathan A. Davis * The University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg
> Box 5171, Hattiesburg, MS 39406 * (601) 266-4107 * Fax: (601) 266-6264
> jonathan.davis@usm.edu * Internet Services Administrator at large... :-)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Unix IS user friendly. It's just more choosy about who its friends are...
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Phil Brutsche
"Be of stout heart, Number One. We've handled the Borg. We can
certainly handle Admiral Jellico." - Jean-Luc Picard
----------------------------------------------------------------------