There are specific reasons for making this change. gcc might known that the
_draft_ ISO standard allows C++ comments, the code checking tools I have do
not. I've got nothing against the "new" (read as left out when B was written)
style comments.
> The ISO standardizes C, not obsolete gcc config files.
Wrong tense - you mean "will"
[related syntactic humour item]
It's also capable of causing different results for the same code depending
if that commenting is supported
int x;
x=2//**/
-1;
if(x==1)
{
printf("Compiled with a C++ compiler.. You lose\n");
exit(1);
}