Re: memory leak detector, 2.0.32, patch

[Regis Duchesne]

> Currently we waste 10% of real
> memory with this detector. Those 10% are well spent IMO, but if there is
> enough demand then it can be decreased to under 5%.
Yes, why not keeping this "waste" as little as possible?

> Let me know if i've missed something. Comments, reports, flames welcome.
Do you plan to do the same kind of patch for 2.1.x kernel? It would be
very useful too.

Is anybody working on the run-time non-blocking function detector whose
idea was recently (one month ago?) submitted by Alan and friends? This
could be very useful too.

Regis "HPReg" Duchesne - Engineering Student at ***** ******** *****
        www              http://www.via.ecp.fr/~regis/
       (O o)             I use Linux & 3Com (1135 KB/s over 10Mb/s ethernet)
--.oOO--(_)--OOo.-----------------------------------------------------------