Re: 2.1.late w/ppp-2.3.2: An alternate solution?

[Richard Gooch]

B. James Phillippe writes:
> Also, on a related note, I think it is time we start pushing the separate
> ppp development trees together.  The continual swapping and
> hand-reconciling of ppp.c and friends between kernel and ppp-dist is
> making this really tough (and making for several dozen unique versions of
> PPP, as well!). 

I'd like to know why (with 2.0.3x or 2.1.x) there is any need to
replace the PPP driver with the one from the PPP package. I also find
the need to fiddle include files really annoying!

				Regards,

					Richard....