Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1997-48,: Re: Examine route.c! -- two bugs fixed -- patch attached!

# Re: Examine route.c! -- two bugs fixed -- patch attached!

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Thu, 4 Dec 1997 15:52:55 +0000 (GMT)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Phil Brutsche: "Re: Loop device"
- Previous message: Bill Hawes: "mechanism for busy inodes in NFS"
- In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Examine route.c! -- two bugs fixed -- patch attached!"
- Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: Examine route.c! -- two bugs fixed -- patch attached!"
- Reply: Ingo Molnar: "Re: Examine route.c! -- two bugs fixed -- patch attached!"

> > the reference count is exactly one. This is in the most cases correct.
> > If Philip found out all possible drops this may be a reason.
>
> Im beginning to suspect we have a kernel/interrupt context problem here and
> the reference counters arent safe

Scratch that it seems.

- Next message: Phil Brutsche: "Re: Loop device"
- Previous message: Bill Hawes: "mechanism for busy inodes in NFS"
- In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Examine route.c! -- two bugs fixed -- patch attached!"
- Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: Examine route.c! -- two bugs fixed -- patch attached!"
- Reply: Ingo Molnar: "Re: Examine route.c! -- two bugs fixed -- patch attached!"