Re: PROPOSAL: /proc/dev
Richard Gooch (rgooch@atnf.CSIRO.AU)
Thu, 1 Jan 1998 14:58:38 +1100
H. Peter Anvin writes:
> Followup to: <199801010025.LAA00236@workaholix.atnf.CSIRO.AU>
> By author: Richard Gooch <rgooch@atnf.CSIRO.AU>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> >
> > Hi, all. My recent work on the /proc/mtrr interface has gotten me
> > thinking about an old discussion: configuring /dev entries. Instead o=
> f
> > complicated schemes for determining what devices are available and
> > automagically creating /dev entries, how about creating entries in
> > /proc/dev instead?
> >=20
>
> Not again...
AFAIK, what I'm proposing is different from other proposals in the
past, which involved complex user-space daemons creating device
files/symlinks on-the-fly. I think /proc/dev is much cleaner than
those proposed daemons.
What is it you don't like about my proposal?
Regards,
Richard....