Re: LM sensors in kernel --- why not?

[David Woodhouse]

[e-mail] said:
>  I'm just curious if it was considered for inclusion in 2.1.xxx (if it
> is not too late yet) or at least 2.3.xx? It does not seem like a large
>  piece of code, and I'm sure I would try it much earlier if it would
> be  in the mainstream kernel. 

It's too late for 2.1, and anyway it's in the middle of a rewrite. By early 
2.3, v2.0 of the lm_sensors code should be available, and that may well get 
included.

----                                 ----                                 ----
David Woodhouse        [e-mail]       Office: ([phone]
 Project Leader,     Process Information Systems      Mobile: [phone]
    Axiom (Cambridge) Ltd., Swaffham Bulbeck, Cambridge, CB5 0NA, UK.
             finger [e-mail] for PGP key.