Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1998-48,: Re: goodness in reschedule idle

# Re: goodness in reschedule idle

Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@e-mind.com)
Thu, 3 Dec 1998 21:09:12 +0100 (CET)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: cua* on kernel 2.1 and beyond"
- Previous message: Leonard N. Zubkoff: "Re: Problem with 1G RAM"

On Thu, 3 Dec 1998, Rik van Riel wrote:

>I think it's a bit of an overkill as it is now, but if you
>include checks for _all_ processors it might make for a
>pretty decent SMP reschedule_idle.

My point is not only SMP, it' s that doing that we call schedule() only
when we are sure that next will be != than prev.

Andrea Arcangeli

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: cua* on kernel 2.1 and beyond"
- Previous message: Leonard N. Zubkoff: "Re: Problem with 1G RAM"