Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1999-20,: Re: most stable 2.2.x kernel?

# Re: most stable 2.2.x kernel?

Rik van Riel (riel@nl.linux.org)
Sat, 15 May 1999 23:11:33 +0200 (CEST)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Jeremy Katz: "Re: [PATCH] Changes in Drivers for New Wait Queue Handling"
- Previous message: Alex Butche: "Re: Sound problems in 2.2.7 and 2.2.8?"

On Fri, 14 May 1999, Brian wrote:

> What is the most stable 2.2.x kernel out their for production use?
> I moved from 2.0.35 to 2.2.8 and had major crashes on about half
> dozen systems. I backed down to 2.2.7-ac4 (I wanted the >1024
> descriptors), and had one crash so far.

I think 2.2.7 and 2.2.9 are the best available, depending
on what kind of hardware you're using.

Rik -- Open Source: you deserve to be in control of your data.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Le Reseau netwerksystemen BV: http://www.reseau.nl/ |
| Linux Memory Management site: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/ |
| Nederlandse Linux documentatie: http://www.nl.linux.org/ |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Jeremy Katz: "Re: [PATCH] Changes in Drivers for New Wait Queue Handling"
- Previous message: Alex Butche: "Re: Sound problems in 2.2.7 and 2.2.8?"